the same protection to the natural expression of body liberty through everyday, non-exploitative nudity on the shore.

124. read is both openly expressive and in private emblematic, connoting identity in a particular ethnic
group.
wearing the clothing unique to their group. Preventing nudists from going naked is equivalent to preventing a
Individual of Scottish ancestry from wearing the family colors, or preventing a priest from wearing his robes.
125. With the emergence of national organizations promoting nudism as a doctrine, bare recreation may
eventually come to be view ed as a safe medium of language expressing that doctrine, and as an example of
Shielded free association.190
126. The Ninth Amendment makes it clear that no liberties shall be denied that are not especially
prohibited.191 Therefore, only nudity isn't illegal except where there are special laws that prohibit it.
http://www.infomanuales.net/_inicio/Marco.asp?dir=https://freenudism.xyz/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/iDMsKi.png prohibit only lewd conduct, not nudity per se; and there's in fact no universal legal prohibition
against nudity on public land.
127. Many prohibitions against nudity stem, historically, from the political climate of the early Christian
church.192 Even today, much of the objection to nudism is founded on spiritual principles. The constitutional
separation of church and state should make this an invalid argument.
128. Extensive legal precedent implies that laws requiring women, but not men, to hide their breasts
are sexist, discriminatory, and unconstitutional.193
the conviction of two women found guilty of showing their breasts in public. The ruling held the state's antinudity
law was meant to apply only to lewd and lascivious behaviour, not to "non commercial, perhaps accidental,
and certainly not lewd, exposure." Herald Price Fahringer, the women's attorney, said that the ruling meant that
women in New York State could sunbathe topfree or even walk down the road with no top, as long as this was not
done in a lewd manner, or for such purposes as prostitution. Judge Vito Titone pointed out that women sunbathe
topfree in many European countries, adding: "To the extent that many in our society may see the uncovered
serve as a reason for different treatment as it is itself a funny cultural artifact rooted in centuries of
prejudice and bias toward girls." 194 This opinion, however, is just one of many statutes and legal precedents
nationwide that carry on the position that breast exposure isn't inherently indecent behaviour.195
129. Case history shows that laws requiring women to cover their breasts aren't warranted by cultural
prejudices and preconceptions.197
130. Laws requiring girls, but not men, to cover their breasts are composed completely from a male

Standpoint, assuming that men's bodies are natural and normal, and that women's bodies must be covered because
they are different.
Reena Glazer finds that "under sameness theory, girls can get equal treatment only to the extent that
they are the same as guys." 198 Physical differences among the races usually do not warrant discrimination, and neither
should physical differences between the genders.
131. Laws requiring women to cover their breasts are not warranted by claims that women's bodies are
significantly distinct from men's; nor by inaccurate claims that breasts are sex organs; nor by the reality that breasts
may play a part in gender or sex play; nor by the reality that breasts are outstanding secondary sex characteristics.
It can not be asserted that women have breasts and men do not, because both do; nor can it be contended that
Girls have larger, often protruding breasts, because many women are flat-chested while many guys have large
breasts. Breasts are not sex organs, for they're not crucial to reproduction, and in fact have nothing to do with it.
A woman with no breasts can get a baby. Breasts serve the physiological function of nourishing a baby--but this is
Breasts may play a role in sex play, but other body parts do too, and are not
censured--especially the hands, along with the mouth (which, incidentally, is veiled by Shi'ite Moslems, partially for that
Really reason, though only on girls). And while breasts are secondary sex characteristics, so are beards, which are
not limited on guys.
132. Mere nudity is not in itself lewd or "indecent exposure," a differentiation upheld by extensive legal
precedent nationwide.199
133. Only nudity cannot be offensive or immoral "actions"--for it is not run in any respect, but simply the
natural state of a human being.
It should be no less legitimate to be in this natural individual state than to be clothed. One's ethnicity is, in addition, a